"Boris D. Beletsky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >>>>>>>> On 21 May 1997, John Goerzen wrote: > > Goerzen> Since we know of a number of things that have been broken in > Goerzen> 2.0.30 (such as IP masquerading being totally hosed), why > Goerzen> are we distributing that version with 1.3? It seems like a > Goerzen> rather bad idea because it could very well break the setups > Goerzen> of a number of people. > Goerzen> > > I agree, I also heard that Ip Masquerading is not the only thing > that seems to be broken. > > thks, > borik > --
While there seems to be consensus on this, it remains a mystery to me, as we have been running 2.0.30 on our masq box successfully for some time now. Am I missing something? (Maybe this is a reference to a new version of ipfwadm being required. If so, can't that be conspicuously included and advertised in the new distribution?) -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Camm Maguire ================================================================== "The earth is one country, and mankind its citizens." Baha'u'llah -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .