On Fri, 22 Oct 2004 16:56:31 -0300, Otavio Salvador <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
jh> When we used to freeze unstable before a release, one of the
jh> problems was that many updates were blocked by that, and once the
jh> freeze was over, unstable tended to become _very_ unstable, and
jh> took months to get back into shape.
> Sure but not we have the experimental distribution to deal with it
We've always had experimental. But consider this: experimental
contains packages _known_ to be volatile, and nobody sane has
experimental turned on for their boxes (most people cherry pick a
package or two that they are interested in). Secondly, buildd's do
not work with experimental.
> while we are stabilizing the unstable and testing distribution. The
> current problem is experimental is not a full distribution and
> doesn't have buildd systems.
That too. If packages don't get tested, you have indeed
arrested development.
manoj
--
Death before dishonor. But neither before breakfast.
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
