Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> However, if unstable would be frozen at the same time, would >> development stop? Probably not. I'm pretty sure that several would >> start with separate repositories and the like to make more recent >> versions of the software available which they maintain. > > When we used to freeze unstable before a release, one of the problems > was that many updates were blocked by that, and once the freeze was > over, unstable tended to become _very_ unstable, and took months to get > back into shape.
What do you think we'd get by combining both (testing + unstable freeze)? -- Jérôme Marant http://marant.org
