Joey writes: >Jan Niehusmann wrote: >> Question to the security team: What's holding back security support for >> sarge? (This is not a complaint - I'm just curious) > >It still (as written on -project one or two weeks ago) lacks the >infrastructure as in a working buildd network that processes the >target ``testing-security''. This is something that two people in >Debian can set up. (This is only information, please don't start >a flamware about it).
Thanks for the info. It would be nice to see this kind of information made more readily available, more often. Colin/Steve - you seem to have been posting about once every 3 weeks listing current sarge status. Can you up the frequency of that please? A weekly short summary might help a great deal to keep people informed and focussed on doing sarge work. -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK. [EMAIL PROTECTED] "I've only once written 'SQL is my bitch' in a comment. But that code is in use on a military site..." -- Simon Booth
