* Francesco P. Lovergine ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [041006 14:20]: > On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 11:52:04AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote: > > Spamassassin 3 is finally in unstable. Thanks to Duncan (and > > possibly others involved)!
> Just for record, I and a few other people removed spamassassin 3 on > my workstation due to performace problems. It is really a memory > and cpu hog. I doubt it is usable as is on any box without > a good deal of horsepower and memory. I would add at least > a big warning in its NEWS file about this, until its problems will be > not solved. If this is not solved, we really should consider to re-introduce spamassassin 2 as spamassassin, and the version 3 as spamassassin3. Cheers, Andi -- http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/ PGP 1024/89FB5CE5 DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F 3B BE F1 D0 C5 D1 D9 0C
