-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 2003-12-05 16:48, Andreas Tille wrote: > On Fri, 5 Dec 2003, cobaco wrote: > > hm, as far as I know Debian-edu is nothing more then a couple of > > task-packages at this point (and some education packages that got added > > to the archive) > > I do not compare the quality of Debian-Edu or SkoleLinux - I just want to > use the right term. Yes, SkoleLinux is currently more useable - no > question.
didn't interprete it thay way, I was just pointing out the state of both Skolelinux and Debian-edu before the Skolelinux/Debian-edu merging announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2003/ debian-devel-announce-200309/msg00011.html started. > > being done for Skolelinux, so basically you're saying that Skolelinux > > (or any other project aiming to be a CDD) is not a CDD untill they get > > everything they need back into Debian proper (which can take quite a > > while), even when we're trying to do so (and always have)? > > That's the definition we agreed to. heh, I was under the impression that the definition was still being discussed , and it certainly doesn't follow the definition I've used throughout this thread (the message where I articulated my definition had a reply saying "exactly", so I also don't appear to be the only one here) > If you would have read my previous mails you would have noticed, that we > use different definitions obviously (while we seem to be misunderstanding each other, why would you assume I haven't read your mails? -> never attribute to malevolence what can be adequately attributed to misunderstanding, mkay?) >and that I want to clarify _the definition_ and coming to an agreement of _the_ definition_ is the subject of this thread, consequently as yet there is no such thing as _the_ definition_. see my answer to Ben armstrong where I try to clarify the point I was making (trying to anyhow) in the previous mail. > I'm not talking about the quality of SkoleLinux (which is damn good). didn't take it that way :-) - -- Cheers, cobaco 1. Encrypted mail preferred (GPG KeyID: 0x86624ABB) 2. Plain-text mail recommended since I move html and double format mails to a low priority folder (they're mainly spam) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/0PCo5ihPJ4ZiSrsRAmc+AJ4jot/Ms3M5bt9ssPTXsyC3lY5L0ACdFbgL 3PVHwZujAdcl6Oj4uTMKL1g= =zexO -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
