On Fri, 5 Dec 2003, cobaco wrote:
> hm, as far as I know Debian-edu is nothing more then a couple of
> task-packages at this point (and some education packages that got added to
> the archive)
I do not compare the quality of Debian-Edu or SkoleLinux - I just want to
use the right term. Yes, SkoleLinux is currently more useable - no question.
> being done for Skolelinux, so basically you're saying that Skolelinux (or any
> other project aiming to be a CDD) is not a CDD untill they get everything
> they need back into Debian proper (which can take quite a while), even when
> we're trying to do so (and always have)?
That's the definition we agreed to.
> hm, the definition I was using for a CDD would include Skolelinux because
> while not everything we do is in Debian _yet_we are trying to get everything
> included into Debian.
If you would have read my previous mails you would have noticed, that we
use different definitions and that I want to clarify _the definition_ and
I'm not talking about the quality of SkoleLinux (which is damn good).
Kind regards
Andreas.
