On Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 02:14:53PM +1100, Andrew Lau wrote: > I don't know whether to file a bug report or just laugh my head off. > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~% vrms > Non-free packages installed on espresso > > > doc-linux-nonfree-text Linux HOWTOs in ASCII format (non-free) > doc-rfc-std Standard RFCs > > Now we all know Richard M. Stallman's position on the GFDL, but I find > it extremely ironic that his virtual persona in Debian now discriminates > against his packages which uses a license his real self would approve.
Out of curiosity, have you actually looked at the licences in doc-linux-nonfree-text? Some of them are GFDL-with-invariant-sections, but quite a number are licences that I think RMS would also disapprove of for documentation (as opposed to personal statements). Cheers, -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
