Hey everyone, I don't know whether to file a bug report or just laugh my head off.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~% vrms
Non-free packages installed on espresso
doc-linux-nonfree-text Linux HOWTOs in ASCII format (non-free)
doc-rfc-std Standard RFCs
Now we all know Richard M. Stallman's position on the GFDL, but I find
it extremely ironic that his virtual persona in Debian now discriminates
against his packages which uses a license his real self would approve.
So is vrms now up for a name change before the real RMS decides to sue
us for misrepresenting him! = )
vbranden?
vdlegal?
Nominations are now open.
Cheers,
Andrew "Netsnipe" Lau
--
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Andrew "Netsnipe" Lau Computer Sci. UNSW & Debian GNU/Linux
<netsnipe(+)users.sf.net\0> <alau(+)cse.unsw.edu.au\0>
GnuPG 1024D/2E8B68BD: 0B77 73D0 4F3B F286 63F1 9F4A 9B24 C07D 2E8B 68BD
-
"Nobody expects the Debian Inquisition!
Our two weapons are fear and surprise...and ruthless efficiency!"
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
