On Mon, Aug 25, 2003 at 01:19:57PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > On Mon, Aug 25, 2003 at 01:22:03PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote: > > > With the former (and still widely used) method for translating debconf > > Is anyone maintaining statistics on how widely used the original Debconf > scheme is?
Greping around in (I love grep-dctrl) http://ftp-master.debian.org/~barbier/l10n/material/data/unstable.gz (used to generate w.d.o/intl/l10n) shows me that there is 2122 strings using old debconf and http://www.debian.org/intl/l10n/po-debconf/rank says that there is 3421 strings using po-debconf. I have no historic on that data; these are the files integrated in the packages, not counting the opened bugs not yet integrated, neither the switches underway and not yet submitted. So, I guess that the transition will be achieved for sarge + 1, at least. Earlier if the french team reachs its goal of completely translated package install in sarge, since we only translate po-debconf files, and do (read submit as patch) the switch if needed. ;) Bye, Mt. -- Never trust someone who only codes in CAML... because the way things are done matters more to him than the result.
