On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 09:33:15AM -0700, Joshua Kwan wrote: > I object strongly too... this is like having one of those 'joke' shells > in the archive :)
Unfortunately, there's a strong historical precedent for the inclusion of csh, making it difficult to get rid of... The same thing could happen if we let this package into the archive. ;) -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer
pgp1EHOE7c4T4.pgp
Description: PGP signature
