On Thu, 15 May 2003 01:08:07 +0200, Björn Stenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Don Armstrong wrote:
>> Debian will always be for whoever the people contributing to Debian
>> are willing/want it to be for. No more, no less.
> Naturally, since it's free software. But saying "Debian is what we
> make it" doesn't answer the question what you _want_ it to be, only
Heh. When I tell you what _I_ want it to be, you dismiss it as
a joke. Or is it the case that you only want to hear what you want
the snawer to be?
> what has been done.
> Surely between the appointed leader, techical committee, policy
> committee, quality assurance team and the release management, there
> is some sort of shared idea of where Debian is heading?
And pray how can these august bodies (BTW, there is no policy
committee, just a mailing list) make things happen? Or lead the
project in any particular direction? By withholding our christmas
bonus?
> This is, after all, more than just a herd of cats.
How on earth did you get that quaint idea? If you want a
universally held firm direction, go read the social contract. That
is as close as you are going to get.
manoj
--
"A slower system is better than an incorrect one." Mark Diekhans
([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
