On Mon, Apr 21, 2003 at 10:34:14PM -0700, David Nusinow wrote: > You're forgetting that we don't really know what Reiser's intentions > are. His complaints don't address anything specific, but instead throw > out terms like plagiarism and bowdlerization in order to avoid listing > specific complaints. Reiser didn't discuss this with the maintainer and > come to an agreement, but instead threw a hissy fit accusing the whole > project of some abstract crimes. We don't know if the problem is due to > the accidental removal of the credits list from the documentation, or
Regardless of what the compliants are, I would hope that the next version of the package (regardless of if it appears in main or non-free) has *this* credits list put back in it. I believe this aspect to be entirely non-controversial, and that it needs to get fixed ASAP, regardless of what the outcome with the other issues might be. I think it was purely an oversight, and in no way intended. It should also be easy to fix. -- Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
