On Tue, Apr 22, 2003 at 05:53:14PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > On Tue, 22 Apr 2003 16:59:59 +1000, Martin Pool <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > For example, at least two people called Hans a troll. An upstream > > author expressing concern about the way their code is packaged is > > not trolling (i.e. making random arguments just to provoke flames.) > I find it interesting that you consider a public accusation of > plagiarism to be merely "expressing concern". However, I also find > your judgment in this horribly tainted, which leads me to place less > credence in the rest of your argument, sorry.
What's that last sentence mean? I can only think of two interpretations:
I don't like you, therefore I think your arguments are wrong.
or
I don't like your conclusion, therefore I think your arguments are
wrong.
Both make for inappropriately fallacious and prejudiced reasoning.
Also, given the degree of hyperbole from developers on -devel, I
don't think it's fair to take cries of "plagiarism" as being anything
particularly out of line.
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.
``Dear Anthony Towns: [...] Congratulations --
you are now certified as a Red Hat Certified Engineer!''
pgpUucmiZPEaL.pgp
Description: PGP signature
