I believe that it is inappropriate to use such an email system that does this when sending messages to the BTS.
Also anyone who wants to use such a system when posting to a popular mailing list (such as debian-devel) should first put in place a white-list of people who regularly post to the list (such as me). For reference, I will not reply to such a message, but I will consider putting the entire domain in my spam filter if such messages continue. ---------- Forwarded Message ---------- Subject: Please confirm your message Date: 30 Nov 2002 15:45:19 -0000 From: "The qconfirm program" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hello, this is the qconfirm mail-handling program at <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. One or more messages from you are being held because your address was not recognized. To release your pending message(s) for delivery, please reply to this request. Your reply will not be read, so an empty message is fine. If you do not reply to this request, your message(s) will eventually be returned to you, and will never be delivered to the envelope recipient. This confirmation verifies that your message(s) are legitimate and not junk-mail. Regards, the qconfirm program, http://smarden.org/qconfirm/ --- Below this line is the top of a message from you. Received: (qmail 11395 invoked from network); 30 Nov 2002 15:45:18 -0000 Received: from tsv.sws.net.au (203.36.46.2) by 0 with SMTP; 30 Nov 2002 15:45:18 -0000 Received: from lyta.coker.com.au (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tsv.sws.net.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83FC292668; Sun, 1 Dec 2002 02:44:48 +1100 (EST) Received: from lyta (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lyta.coker.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E1FA908E; Sat, 30 Nov 2002 16:44:40 +0100 (CET) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Russell Coker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: Russell Coker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Gerrit Pape" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#171253: ITP: libdjbdns -- DNS client library designed to replace the BIND res_*/dn_* library Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2002 16:44:39 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.4.3 References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> On Sat, 30 Nov 2002 15:34, Gerrit Pape wrote: > License: Bernstein has put the .[ch] files (dns.h, dns_dfd.c, > dns_domain.c, dns_dtda.c, dns_ip.c, dns_ipq.c, dns_mx.c, dns_name.c, > dns_nd.c, dns_packet.c, dns_random.c, dns_rcip.c, dns_rcrw.c, > dns_resolve.c, dns_sortip.c, dns_transmit.c, dns_txt.c) and all > necessary lower-level .[ch] files into the public domain[1]. I do not > plan to make any changes to those files, so Bernstein's djbdns security > guarantee[2] applies. My additions to the package will be licensed under > a BSD compatible license. The URL did not make this license adequately clear to me. Does this specifically differ from the license of Qmail? ------------------------------------------------------- -- http://www.coker.com.au/selinux/ My NSA Security Enhanced Linux packages http://www.coker.com.au/bonnie++/ Bonnie++ hard drive benchmark http://www.coker.com.au/postal/ Postal SMTP/POP benchmark http://www.coker.com.au/~russell/ My home page
