[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Brian Wolfe) writes: > Actualy, I believe that the mkisofs maintainer should have seen that a > new option was created and notified the maintainers of anything that > depended on mkisofs ...
That's pushing it, I think. I've had several experiences as a maintainer where something in an upstream package changed that seemed insignificant to me, but which broke some other package that depended on mine. These events aren't a big deal if everyone is "engaged" and bugs are getting addressed as they are reported. Let's stick to the main problem. Bdale
