Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au> writes: > Oh god no. Please no. Inflating bug severeties just makes it harder to > do releases; if there's a problem with normal bugs being ignored (and, > IMO, there is), it needs to be addressed directly, not worked around by > filing everything as important or higher.
But I think the point here is that the presence of a jillion normal bugs, unaddressed for years, constitutes a release-critical bug, and we want some way to filter such packages out of the release. At least, that's what I thought the idea was about.