On Sep 17, 11:37am, Lars Wirzenius wrote: } Subject: Bug#4495: gs fonts should be in /usr/share/ghostscript/fonts } --==_Exmh_840876923P } Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii } } joost witteveen: } > Could you (or somebody else on this list) point me to some text that } > details this rule? My /usr/share is next to empty, while /usr/lib } > contains _lot's_ of system-independand files } } /usr/share is part of the next revision of the FSSTND (now called } FHS). I don't think Debian has embraced it yet, nor should we, since } it's not finished yet.
So why do we choose to use /usr/share for locales, for example? I remember we discussed that and adopted /usr/share, no? Yves. -- Yves Arrouye Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 7, avenue Leon Bollee Web: http://www.fdn.fr/~yarrouye/ 75013 Paris Work: +33 45 95 64 59 France Home: +33 53 61 09 55
