On Wed, Apr 25, 2001 at 09:53:13PM +0200, Russell Coker wrote: > On Wednesday 25 April 2001 21:49, Daniel Stone wrote: > > True, but often very little, if anything, gets done. about it; seeing as > > it's just a very small percentage of Linux users. A lot of people are in > > the production mentality, and figure that if it only breaks for 3 Linux > > people ... > > If you have a serious server you don't want it to break for anyone. If your > machine breaks for some portion of the Linux user base then when someone > reports problems with your site you won't know if that person uses Linux, if > they use an ISP with a Linux web cache etc, or if it's something else.
Yes, but AFAIK the only way the only "patch" Cisco provides is a new IOS, which has had a couple of problems. I can understand why admins would be nervous, doing a complete (*major version*) IOS upgrade. > Professional network administrators fix all problems they know of. It's the > only way to control a network! > > > > It's not that difficult to track down the offending sites and report the > > > problem to the network administrators! > > > > No, but it's just difficult to get anything changed. > > Hotmail got changed! It did? I stand corrected. -- Daniel Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED]
