On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 10:30:22PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote: > On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 10:27:18PM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote: > > > > No argument there, but this is where necessity and duplication comes into > > play. These documentation packages, don't have 14 copies of the same file > > now, do they? > > Well, why don't you start writing a patch? And please submit the bug against > the right package, i.e., work out who's constructing what before you go off > filing bugs.
<elmo>I would be doing something productive [i.e. that patch] right now, if this thread weren't wasting my time.</elmo> Oddly enough, I now *start* to see his point. BTW, I have neither the time (p100 with 48meg? multiple kernel builds, each time you build the package, and that's bound to be a few, because of testing?) or the space (multiple kernel trees, multiple kernel compiles, on 3.3gig?) to really do this, but I'll try anyway. -- Daniel Stone Linux Kernel Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
