On 04-Jan-01, 15:24 (CST), John Galt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 4 Jan 2001, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > > MS> He may have, as I do, intend to reply to the list, so everyone > MS> can see the conversation. (Quite properly, my MUA ignored the reply > MS> to on a list reply; had I cared to respond to you personally, the > MS> reply-to header would have been respected). > > Yeah, but he was making the point that the reply-to header broke things > like listreplies. They still seem to work....
Manoj was correct about my intent. The point I was making was that munging "Reply-To:" to point to the list breaks *personal* replies. Sorry that wasn't clear. Steve -- Steve Greenland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Please do not CC me on mail sent to this list; I subscribe to and read every list I post to.)
