On 4 Jan 2001, Manoj Srivastava wrote: MS>>>"John" == John Galt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: MS> MS> SG> Wrong. This would break my MUA so that "reply" no longer sends mail back MS> SG> to the originator, as it is supposed to do. MS> MS> John> Well, you replied to the list alone despite my reply-to, so I guess your MS> John> actions don't match your words... MS> MS> He may have, as I do, intend to reply to the list, so everyone MS> can see the conversation. (Quite properly, my MUA ignored the reply MS> to on a list reply; had I cared to respond to you personally, the MS> reply-to header would have been respected).
Yeah, but he was making the point that the reply-to header broke things like listreplies. They still seem to work.... MS> manoj MS> -- Pardon me, but you have obviously mistaken me for someone who gives a damn. email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
