Buddha Buck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >I understand fully that using the name "non-US" for patent-encumbered > >software is wrong. However, the machine pandora.debian.org is in an > >excellent position to also host a "non-Software-Patents" section of the > >archive, which can again be subdivided in main, contrib and non-free. > > If we do that, I suggest that "non-Software-Patents" is a bad > name. Perhaps "patented" is a better name.
Does it have to be tied to patent-problems? What about a more general section named (for example) "encumbered"? It could then also be used for software with other sorts of local problems -- like "indexed" games here in germany. Lars -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
