At 07:40 PM 9/5/00 +0200, Bart Schuller wrote:
What frustrates me is that there's software that's
- useful - free - legal (at least for quite a few millions of people)
but not officially available for Debian.
I understand fully that using the name "non-US" for patent-encumbered software is wrong. However, the machine pandora.debian.org is in an excellent position to also host a "non-Software-Patents" section of the archive, which can again be subdivided in main, contrib and non-free.
If we do that, I suggest that "non-Software-Patents" is a bad name. Perhaps "patented" is a better name.
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
