#include <hallo.h> * William Ballard [Mon, Jan 10 2005, 11:32:45AM]: > On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 05:21:53PM +0100, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote: > > identify problems, both in upstream and packaged versions. Posting in > > d-d is at least inappropriate. > > It's an open list.
There is some reason for its existance (discussions about general development). > works and another guy is trying to produce a package which requires > module-assistant and "looks like" other packages. What are other packages?! WTF do are you talking about? You go to a dessert when you wanna drink? Or how can you explain this attitude? If you do not know what I mean, try building your dear modules package on a pure installation. You will have to install build-essential and/or dpkg-dev in order to do _anything_. And doing so, you could also install the module-assistant package (about 40kB) but provides some comfort for users and comfort, code size reduction, extendability, automatic feature upgrades for developers. > The upstream is better. It's already Debianized. Do not use the one in > the Debian archive. What do you smoke? - broken / insufficient Dependencies - lacks of features like package signing (no kdist rule) and destination directory specification. A typical obsolete template from dh_make. - Oh jeez, it depends on the utils package? Have you already sent a "you stupid dickhead" mail to the upstream already? No? Why not? Regards, Eduard. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
