On Tue, 2005-01-11 at 05:05 +1100, Sam Watkins wrote: > Even if the d-d for ndiswrapper has done something wrong or not, even if > the upstream package is better (I don't know the facts, and I'm not > personally interested), it is NOT necessary to be rude and go on the > offensive like this. Please simply state your case, using calm language > and unadorned facts (as you see them) and let people discuss the > technical issues without all the "You've F'd it up beyond all > recognition", "horribly broken" etc. Believe it or not, some people get > upset at this sort of stuff, even when it's not directed at them. > > Several people - not just me - have complained about unnecessary > flamage, rudeness, bad language, personal abuse, etc. on the Debian > lists and the IRC channel in recent months. Let's cut it out and > remember that we're talking in public, on an archived list, we're > supposed to be representing Debian here. This kind of talk does not > give Debian a good name. > To heck with representing debian, we each represent ourselves, and we are out there _FOREVER_. There's some 20 year old stuff I would love to obliterate. (It still can be found if you're good, but I'm not telling :)
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
