On Sun, 19 Jan 2014, Steve Langasek wrote: > As you say that planned features or development could sway your > opinion: are there particular features that you have in mind, here? > For instance, correcting upstart's socket-based activation interface > is on the upstart roadmap in the jessie timeframe.
These particular changes would make my decision even more difficult, but wouldn't change it. More major changes, like adding features to eliminate the need for non-descriptive shell fragments, and moving to a primarily dependency based model from an event one would completely reduce the technically superior position that systemd has, in my opinion. -- Don Armstrong http://www.donarmstrong.com A Bill of Rights that means what the majority wants it to mean is worthless. -- U.S. Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ctte-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20140121212154.gc12...@rzlab.ucr.edu
