Anthony Towns writes ("Re: mixmaster /etc/default/*"):
> This is exactly the sort of thing I think we should simply ignore rather
> than issue any sort of ruling on. It's simply not important enough to
> be an issue. ie, unless someone on the tech ctte wants to champion the
> submitter's cause, I think we should simply reassign the bug back to
> mixmaster and close it. Err, if it's actually been assigned to the ctte
> by now.I find it hard to understand this suggestion of yours. Are you saying that in general, if we disagree with the submitter of a bug, we should not issue a formal decision saying so, but instead just sit on our hands ? That would seem like an odd way of carrying on. Obviously if a particular submitter was very vexatious we might decide not to entertain any more of their complaints but that would be something more akin to what is now called a `civil restraint order' in the civil courts of England and Wales. But I don't think anyone is suggesting that in this case. We just think the submitter is wrong. It seems to me that we should say so. Ian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
