The traditional and simple chinese are both a piece of cake for me. :) As the traffic of both lists are low, I suggest merge them.
Zu wrote: > I prefer merging and I agree that "traditional and simplified Chinese > are all Chinese". > > > -- > Email/Gtalk/MSN/QQ: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > 瑞豪开源VPS - 基于Linux/Xen > http://www.RasHost.com > > 2008/4/30 Kanru Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>: > > Hi Andrew, > > I think we should respect the opinions from who are actually using the > lists, so I forward this mail to the lists. > > 2008/4/30 Andrew Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>: > > Dear folks, > > > > Foka went on IRC and ask for merge debian-chinese-big5 and > > debian-chinese-gb into one mailing list. Please check the log for > > details or read these(I copied from my log) below: > > > > 01:56 < foka> 我最近有��想法：如果把 debian-chinese-big5 和 > > debian-chinese-gb > > 二合�橐唬�大家看法如何？ :-) > > 01:57 < aguai> foka: 不懂？ > > 01:57 < paulliu> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:P > > 01:57 < paulliu> aguai, 那是���� mailing list > > 01:58 < foka> paulliu, [EMAIL PROTECTED] UTF-8 年代了，也不再存 > 在以前 > > Big5、GB2312 �]件�y�a的���}了。 > > 01:58 < paulliu> 嗯, [EMAIL PROTECTED] big5 的意 > 思����是 > > chinese-traditional > > 01:59 < paulliu> �m然大家都是中��人...不�^繁�w跟���w..��是��有一 > 些���x上 > > 的困�_.. > > 02:01 < paulliu> 不�^, debian-chinese-big5 �]有甚�N traffic 就是了.. > > 02:01 < paulliu> [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > 02:01 < paulliu> 我是�X得, 繁�w中文跟���w中文, 有�r是��分�_的... > > 02:02 < foka> 其��整�w�碚f��好；我�J�R好多台���淼呐笥眩�很快熟�R > ���w字 > > 了。大��朋友看繁�w字，倒也不是���}，只是��不出�矶�已。 > > 02:02 < paulliu> 是可以看的懂, 但是我自己的����是...偶��要猜... > > 02:03 < foka> paulliu, 呵呵，正好互相�W��。 :-) > > 02:03 < paulliu> 也�S���w中文猜中意思的�C率是 9x%, 日文�h字 4x%...... > > > > Debian do have lists for different languages. I think it's easier for > > support our users. Cause they can use their mother language to ask > > question and got answer by the mother language. We have > separately lists > > because long time ago, we have encoding difference problem on > big5 and > > gb2312, so that we have two lists for Chinese. > > > > But my opinion now Debian is a global community, it is not > specfic for > > any nation or racism. Who use traditional or simplified Chinese are > > equal participant. > > > > But everyone can has opinion. Paulliu said that traditional and > > simplified Chinese are all Chinese, which I agreed. And Paulliu also > > think traditional and simplified Chinese should be separate. > > > > However the point I concerned is our users support and free software > > community. > > > > So I'd like to ask, what's you guys' opinion: > > Does our community only limited in Taiwan or China? > > Do you guys agree people from over the world can be also part of > Debian > > community? > > You guys prefer to do the user support together or separately, > and why? > > > > Please give your valuable opinion. > > > > Kindest regards, > > > > -Andrew > > > > > > -- > ~ Kanru Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> > 'v' http://stu.csie.ncnu.edu.tw/~kanru.96/ > <http://stu.csie.ncnu.edu.tw/%7Ekanru.96/> > // \\ GnuPG-Key ID: 365CC7A2 > /( )\ Fingerprint: 3278 DFB4 BB28 6E8C 9E1F 1ECB B1B7 5B5F 365C C7A2 > ^`~'^ > > > -- Best Regards, Ding Honghui -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
