On Fri, May 31, 2002 at 10:54:47AM +1200, Philip Charles wrote: > On Thu, 30 May 2002, Santiago Vila wrote: > > What's wrong with basic-desktop being x-window-system-core plus a WM > > plus xterm? As I said, x-window-system contains things which are far > > away from being "basic". If we force it to be on CD #1, lots of very > > popular packages will end up being in CD #2. > The freeze?
Tweaking the contents of the tasks are okay, it's only redoing the task mechanism (to have "core" packages for a task and "auxiliary" packages, eg) that's not an option for woody at this point. Cheers, aj -- Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/> I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred. ``BAM! Science triumphs again!'' -- http://www.angryflower.com/vegeta.gif -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
