On Thu, 2002-05-30 at 12:30, Wichert Akkerman wrote: > Previously Philip Hands wrote: > > The good news is that TeX is in, the bad news is that packages such as > > xdm, xfs & xterm are out. This seems bad, but I suppose since gdm & kdm > > are on there, and one can survive without xfs, and gnome-terminal is in, > > we could actually live without those, but will the resulting lack of > > x-window-system cause a problem with the tasks? > > Breaking X is imho a much worse than getting TeX on CD1. gnome-terminal > is definitely not a replacement for xterm.
OK, the latest cut is much better: http://www.hands.com/~phil/woody-cd/pre6-pre8-package.diff.txt Note' this is the diff against the "With X, but missing TeX" pre6, so the fact that there is no mention of things like xdm means they're still on CD#1 Things to note: erlang is still in, on the strength of its (spurious) listing as a non-US package, so once non-US is cleaned up, we'll have a load more space on CD#1. The three Non-US packages at the end of this, that have gone to CD#7, are also now in the main US archive, so are not in fact contaminating CD7 with non-US stuff. Having exchanged the kernel images for the kernel source, we should probably make sure that all the patches required to make the images we've removed also be included on CD#1 --- any suggestions on how to maintain a definitive list? The jigdos that go with this are starting to appear here: http://cdimage.debian.org/jigdo-area/3.0-pre8/ Cheers, Phil. -- Say no to software patents! http://petition.eurolinux.org/ |)| Philip Hands [+44 (0)20 8530 9560] http://www.hands.com/ |-| HANDS.COM Ltd. http://www.uk.debian.org/ |(| 10 Onslow Gardens, South Woodford, London E18 1NE ENGLAND
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
