> > On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 09:37:33PM +0200, Bernd Hentig wrote:
> > > AFAIK, the only kernels worth having in either binary or source
> > > are (in release order) 2.0.36, 2.0.17, 2.0.19, 2.4.2. All others are
>
> > You don't like *any* of the 2.2 series?
>
> it looks like a typo to me
>
> 2.0.36, 2.2.17, 2.2.19, 2.4.2
Yeah, sure this was a typo :)
Sorry folks, I was in a hurry and probably hit the keys faster than my
brain was working - need a CPU upgrade probably ;-)
>
> i am not sure why one would want 2.0.36 or 2.2.17 on cd1.. i would
> have put them on cd3, but that's just my opinion. from what anne
> originally said though, 10 kernels is certainly getting out of hand
> (and disk space) in a release sense.
Yes. Usually I can't think of any reason to have the kernel sources
of any version other than the installation kernel on the first CD.
My idea was that not too many kernel source trees should be on the
distribution CDs at all since they are just taking space and there
won't be many people using them.
Bernd
--
ixsoft Softwareentwicklung und -vertrieb Bernd Hentig
Unter den Buchen 22E, D-16244 Altenhof, Germany
Voice ++49 333 63 46 100 Fax ++49 333 63 46 109
Email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
