On Sat, 21 Apr 2001, Nate Duehr wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 09:37:33PM +0200, Bernd Hentig wrote:
> > AFAIK, the only kernels worth having in either binary or source
> > are (in release order) 2.0.36, 2.0.17, 2.0.19, 2.4.2. All others are
> You don't like *any* of the 2.2 series?
it looks like a typo to me
2.0.36, 2.2.17, 2.2.19, 2.4.2
i am not sure why one would want 2.0.36 or 2.2.17 on cd1.. i would
have put them on cd3, but that's just my opinion. from what anne
originally said though, 10 kernels is certainly getting out of hand
(and disk space) in a release sense.
have debian addressed the alleged file corruption (ext2) issue that
i heard was present in 2.4.X uptil 2.4.3 ?
regards,
-jason
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
