Hi Ian, Thanks for cleaning up this mess, and apologies for creating it in the first place... I agree the tooling could & should be better here, but I still should have caught this while I did the upload.
The changes look good to me. Jelmer On Fri, Dec 31, 2021 at 12:09:29AM +0000, Ian Jackson wrote: > Hi. I have just pushed a version of xdelta which resolves the changes > made in 1.1.3-9.4 with those made in 1.1.3-10.1 (which was mistakenly > based on 1.1.3-9, omitting the intervening NMU changes). > > The resulting package now has the libraries in the multiarch paths. I > think all is probably well, but the package doesn't have > autopkgtests. Typing "xdelta" with the .debs installed works so I > think it's fine ? I hope some other package's autopkgtests will > detect it if not. > > Here is the numduff. It is against 1.1.3-9.4. I think this should be > regarded as the nmudiff for both #965890 and #1002851. Diffs > involving 1.1.3-10.1 are unreasonably cluttered by autogenerated file > changes. > > I hope this meets with everyone's approval. > Happy new year! > > Ian. > > > > -- > Ian Jackson <ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk> These opinions are my own. > > Pronouns: they/he. If I emailed you from @fyvzl.net or @evade.org.uk, > that is a private address which bypasses my fierce spamfilter. -- Jelmer Vernooij <jel...@jelmer.uk> PGP Key: https://www.jelmer.uk/D729A457.asc
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature