Hi Martin, Martin Quinson <martin.quin...@ens-rennes.fr> 于2020年6月6日周六 下午7:11写道： > > Hello, > > thanks for pointing me to this, I didn't know. And even now, I'm not sure of > whether frogatto-data is auto-buildable. The reason why it's non-free is > because the licence file states: "The Frogatto game and all content is > available for download free of charge from http://www.frogatto.com. The game > may be redistributed for non-commercial purposes so long as the entire > package is kept in-tact and unmodified. This license must also be included > and kept in-tact. It is forbidden to distribute the game, or any portion > thereof for any commercial or revenue-generating purpose." > > Under this light, should I mark the package as auto-buildable? I tend to > think so but would appreciate your guidance.
I don't have a firm answer for this. Maybe you can write an email to the buildd team (non-f...@buildd.debian.org or other email address) for answer? > In the meanwhile, I'll do a source+binary upload of the package. This should fall back to the old behavior and not introduce new problems. I have no idea if britney would influence testing migration though (probably not since this is of non-free). -- Thanks, Boyuan Yang
