Hi DKG,
> Please make sure you can build the package from the debian/master branch > at https://salsa.debian.org/debian/wireguard> . > > If you can do that successfully (it shouldn't be too hard), feel free to > take a look at the debian/TODO file, which contains a handful of > suggestions, mostly about setting up more detailed autopkgtest testing. Building is no problem. I will dig into the autopkgtest testing. It is rather new to me. > > Another thing that might be handy is to read through the discussion > starting here: > > > https://lists.debian.org/deity/2019/09/msg00017.html > > > The idea is to propose a debian package for binary wireguard kernel > modules that matches the current kernel package, so that users > wouldn't > need to use dkms. getting the dependency details right there is > tricky, > as is keeping it up to date, but it might be worth trying. Interesting, needs more digging from my side. > > I've pushed a very ungainly initial attempt at this binary module > packaging to > https://salsa.debian.org/debian/wireguard-modules > -- you > might want to take a look at that and consider fixing one of the > things > in debian/TODO there, and proposing a fix. > Alternately, testing its > build and seeing whether the resultant binary works or not on systems > without dkms would also be interesting. That shouldn't be a problem. First I will take the autopkgtest. Greetings, Willem
