Hi Andreas, > Would an explicit, direct dependency on texlive-binaries have led to > another apt order in the dist-upgrade?
Actually, in this case no, you are right. The problem was pointed out by Adrian - in postrm the availability of depending packages is not guaranteed. > > Furthermore, it would be much simpler to *NOT* do anything as mktexlsr > > is called automatically (trigger on /usr/share/texmf). > > Sorry, didn't know this. No prob, although it has been like this since about 2010 or even 2009 ;-) > This suggestion renders the discussion above about a direct dependency > on texlive-binaries obsolete. I would be happy to drop the mktexlsr Indeed. > calls in postrm/postinst. In this case the postrm call failed, thus the > fix needs to be applied to *jessie* dblatex, doesn't it? In principle, yes. All the best Norbert -- PREINING Norbert http://www.preining.info Accelia Inc. + JAIST + TeX Live + Debian Developer GPG: 0x860CDC13 fp: F7D8 A928 26E3 16A1 9FA0 ACF0 6CAC A448 860C DC13
