Norbert Preining <prein...@logic.at> wrote: Hi Norbert,
thanks for your feedback.
> > > # A call to 'mktexlsr' is needed to register the dblatex TeX files
> > > # in the TeX database '/var/lib/texmf/ls-R-TEXMFMAIN'.
>
> There is a simple bug here:
> * no dependency on texlive-binaries, which provides mktexlsr
dblatex depends on texlive, which depends on texlive-latex-base, which
depends on texlive-binaries. Is this indirect dependency too weak?
Would an explicit, direct dependency on texlive-binaries have led to
another apt order in the dist-upgrade?
> Furthermore, it would be much simpler to *NOT* do anything as mktexlsr
> is called automatically (trigger on /usr/share/texmf).
Sorry, didn't know this.
> Since the postinst script does nothing else TeX related, it would be
> the simplest solution to completly drop the code about mktexlsr.
This suggestion renders the discussion above about a direct dependency
on texlive-binaries obsolete. I would be happy to drop the mktexlsr
calls in postrm/postinst. In this case the postrm call failed, thus the
fix needs to be applied to *jessie* dblatex, doesn't it?
Regards, Andreas
--
Andreas Hoenen <andr...@hoenen-terstappen.de>
GPG: 1024D/B888D2CE
A4A6 E8B5 593A E89B 496B
82F0 728D 8B7E B888 D2CE
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
