tags 689508 + help tags 744398 + help thanks Hi,
On Wed, 3 Oct 2012, Raphael Herzog wrote:
On Wed, 03 Oct 2012, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> > FTR, debsums should not ignore *all* "obsolete" Conffiles entries (that
> > would be trivial), but only those for files not longer "owned" by the
> > package in question.
> Yes.
I don't get why debsums should care about obsolete conffiles? (Assuming they
are marked as obsolete in /var/lib/dpkg/status...) - could you please explain?
I'd really like to see #744398, it's currently severly affecting piuparts.d.o
testing of sid, testing2sid and some other suites. (Which I only can easily
"workaround" by disabling debsums tests there..)
(Im also unsure whether to merge #689508 and #744398, currently I leave them
seperated to keep some more clarity.)
Oh, and btw, should we formally orphan debsums?
This is on a freshly debootstrapped sid system, the .bak file is from directly
after running deboostrap, the .sid file is from directly after running
dist-upgrade for the first time...
# cp /etc/init/startpar-bridge.conf.bak /etc/init/startpar-bridge.conf
# debsums -e startpar
/etc/init/startpar-bridge.conf FAILED
# debsums -e sysvinit-utils
/etc/init/startpar-bridge.conf OK
# cp /etc/init/startpar-bridge.conf.sid /etc/init/startpar-bridge.conf
# debsums -e startpar
/etc/init/startpar-bridge.conf OK
# debsums -e sysvinit-utils
/etc/init/startpar-bridge.conf FAILED
cheers,
Holger
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
