On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 11:44 AM, Michael Gebetsroither <mich...@mgeb.org> wrote: > On 2011-04-01 09:20, Sergei Golovan wrote: >> On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 10:44 AM, Michael Gebetsroither <mich...@mgeb.org> >> wrote: > Hi Sergei, > >>> Thx for closing this bug so fast! >>> >>> Will all this bugs also be closed in 'Squeeze'? >> >> I don't think so. If it's so important, I'll create a backport of >> R14B02 and put it into backports.debian.org. > > But the real problem is that the version from debian Squeeze > is _unusable_ as it has multiple exploits in core parts and multiple > silent data corruption bugs.
At least I didn't see these bugs myself. > > So R14A should NOT be used by anyone, as it is a BETA version > of the erlang VM, so clearly the worst target for a long-term > stable release such as Squeeze. > > The only real solution would be to include R14B0x in every > Debian security upgrade of Squeeze. > Yea the problem remains with those incompatible changes... Unfortunately, I couldn't upload R14B01 and R14B02 to squeeze because of freeze. (My fault. I should've left R13B05 instead.) For now, I guess the only option is to backport fixes from R1402. > > Including R14B02 in squeeze-backports would be a good start to > see which erlang software from squeeze has problems with R14B02 > and as a strongly encouraged version to use for most users. I don't expect many problems with R14B02. Cheers! -- Sergei Golovan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
