Hi,

On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 07:24:43PM +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote:
> > I'm not going to do option 5 myself because I have no idea how to test 
> > tdiary,
> > but that seems like the only way we're likely to keep it in Squeeze.
> > Since tdiary is a leaf package with a lowish popcon score, I'm inclined to
> > ask the release team to drop tdiary from squeeze (i.e. option 1) if there 
> > isn't any progress on this.

>  Those swf files are not main component for tdiary, but just an addon,
>  so option 5 approach is kind for us (me, upstream authors and other users).
> 
>  And surely I can test it (roughly, though).
>  Dai, could you upload updated one to mentors or attache debdiff for it?

uploaded to mentors.

- URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/t/tdiary
- Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main 
contrib non-free
- dget 
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/t/tdiary/tdiary_2.2.1+dfsg1-0.1.dsc

I repackaged source tarball and modified debian/tdiary.copyright and
debian/changelog.  Would you please check and modify to suitable
for official?
-- 
Regards,
        dai

GPG Fingerprint = 0B29 D88E 42E6 B765 B8D8 EA50 7839 619D D439 668E

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to