Hi, > I'm not going to do option 5 myself because I have no idea how to test tdiary, > but that seems like the only way we're likely to keep it in Squeeze. > Since tdiary is a leaf package with a lowish popcon score, I'm inclined to > ask the release team to drop tdiary from squeeze (i.e. option 1) if there > isn't any progress on this.
I'm one of the users of tdiary :) # and had worked for DSA for this package http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=572417 Those swf files are not main component for tdiary, but just an addon, so option 5 approach is kind for us (me, upstream authors and other users). And surely I can test it (roughly, though). Dai, could you upload updated one to mentors or attache debdiff for it? -- Regards, Hideki Yamane henrich @ debian.or.jp/org http://wiki.debian.org/HidekiYamane -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
