Hello Steve, On Thu, Aug 16, 2007 at 05:42:31AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 05:56:45PM +0200, Helge Kreutzmann wrote: > I took a peek upstream and found that at least part of this was addressed > already back in 2003 in the sf cvs tree, so I've gone ahead and merged > across from there to the alioth cvs tree as a new vendor import; this
Thanks! > userspace -- the only reason asm/system.h is useful to aboot is because > aboot is a bootloader, and that's not really the use case for > linux-libc-dev. Yes, thats why I was a little skeptical to plainly look for inclusion. > This is all in the Debian CVS repo now, and I've also uploaded a source > package to <http://people.debian.org/~vorlon/aboot/>. I'll have a look at it over the weekend and then see that I get a new release prepared (which I intended to do anyhow). > > [1] Last time I checked, upstream no longer responded, but I still > > have access to the sf repository, so including fixes upstream > > could be possible :-)) > > It doesn't look like you're a project admin, though, so you can't grant > anyone else access. Can you do file releases? It might be a good idea to Honestly I've never looked at those details before, as I never intended to release something. > have some sort of release tarball for aboot after the current round of > clean-ups. My merge corresponds to what upstream labelled as version > "1.0_pre20040408", but there was never a file release for it... Once everything is cleaned out for Debian I'll have a look what I can do at SF, maybe I even reach upstream again. Greetings & Thanks once more Helge -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software "libre": http://www.ffii.de/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
