On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 17:24, Barak A. Pearlmutter <[email protected]> wrote: >> By either of the two solutions, you need to repack the upstream >> source to remove the problematic files, just like what we did with >> other packages to make their source tarball DFSG free. > > This waf issue has nothing to do with being DFSG free. > It is a policy question concerning making examining sources more > convenient for people and automated tools. >
I mean you need to repack it "like" what we do with those package needs to be DFSG free. Here you can simply remove waf and wscript and repack the source if they are not used at all. -- Regards, Aron Xu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
