On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 18:15, Sebastian Ramacher <s.ramac...@gmx.at> wrote: > Hi, > > thank you for uploading gmtk. > > On 01/06/2012 01:03 AM, Aron Xu wrote: >> IMHO for the most commonly used build systems, like autotools and cmake, the >> license of those files can be omitted in d/copyright. >> >> As you had mentioned, I did a quick check for gecko-mediaplayer's copyright >> and >> found two problems: >> 1.INSTALL is not licensed under GFDL, also GFDL isn't DFSG Free. > > So we could actually drop all the build system related stuff in > debian/copyright? This would make it much more simpler. >
Yes for the default build system files generated by autotools. >> 2.For files that have multiple licenses, for example MPL-1.1, GPL-2+ >> and LGPL-2.1+, >> we need to add the "license block" in d/copyright, also including the >> actual text of >> those three licenses. > > Isn't it enough the way it is? We have the text of all three licenses in an > extra block and the files are marked appropriately. > It's probably enough, but better to have all the given information included. > We probably should ask upstream to clarify the copyright status of > src/*.[c,h]. > Most of the files seam to be modified a lot. > It will be great to do so. -- Regards, Aron Xu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
