On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 00:52, Sebastian Ramacher <s.ramac...@gmx.at> wrote: > On 01/05/2012 05:11 PM, Aron Xu wrote: >> Ok, thank you to let me know. Is the package ready on your side? If >> yes, I'll upload it. > > Is debian/copyright okay? Or should we document the licenses from the build > system (as in gecko-mediaplayer) there too? > > Otherwise it's ready from my side. > > Kind regards, > -- > Sebastian Ramacher >
IMHO for the most commonly used build systems, like autotools and cmake, the license of those files can be omitted in d/copyright. As you had mentioned, I did a quick check for gecko-mediaplayer's copyright and found two problems: 1.INSTALL is not licensed under GFDL, also GFDL isn't DFSG Free. 2.For files that have multiple licenses, for example MPL-1.1, GPL-2+ and LGPL-2.1+, we need to add the "license block" in d/copyright, also including the actual text of those three licenses. -- Regards, Aron Xu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org