Package: libpodofo0.8.0
Version: 0.8.0+svn20100512-1.1
Severity: serious

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Dear libpodofo0.8.0 maintainers,

after having NMUed both libpodofo and libpodofo0.8.0 for the libjpeg
transition, I noticed that libpofodo0.8.0 was not getting built on some
architectures. After a short chat on #debian-buildd, it appeared that the
problem is that src:libpodofo0.8.0 builds libpodofo-dev, which is already
built by src:libpodofo.

Given that src:libpodofo0.8.0 has no reverse build-dependencies in both
testing and unstable and that all the packages now build against
src:libpodofo's -dev package, I think src:libpodofo0.8.0 should really get
removed from the archive.

Now, I propose to discuss this issue on that RC bugreport during _one_week_,
after which (depending on the held discussion) I will reassign this bug to
ftp.master.org as a removal.

Cheers,

OdyX

- -- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers stable-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), 
(500, 'stable'), (150, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 3.0.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=fr_CH.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_CH.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages libpodofo0.8.0 depends on:
ii  libc6           2.13-21         
ii  libfontconfig1  2.8.0-3         
ii  libfreetype6    2.4.7-2         
ii  libgcc1         1:4.6.2-4       
ii  libjpeg62       6b1-2           
ii  libstdc++6      4.6.2-4         
ii  libtiff4        3.9.5-2         
ii  zlib1g          1:1.2.3.4.dfsg-3

libpodofo0.8.0 recommends no packages.

libpodofo0.8.0 suggests no packages.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
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=9Gdl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to