On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 10:47:07AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote: > On Sep 12, Horms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > So, either you deleted the symlink yourself or installed the package > > > with debris existing in /etc/udev/rules.d/ or the preinst upgrade code > > > is buggy (but it looks simple enough to me). Which one? > > I would say that the buggy option is likely. > > How should we test this? > Purge udev, check that /etc/udev/rules.d/ is clean, install the previous > release you used, upgrade to the current release. > But first you should first check preinst yourself, maybe you will see > what I possibly missed.
Hi, I tried to reproduce this by upgrading from 0.056-3 (testing) to 0.068-2 (unstable), but the problem did not manifest. I think I had some intermediate versionm but I am not sure and i foolishly purged my cache immediately after the upload. Perhaps the postint would be less fragile to failure if it only added the symlinks if they didn't exist individually, rather than aborting if any of them exist. Or perhaps prompting the user. -- Horms -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
