On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 02:49:29PM +0100, Michael Banck wrote: > It fixes a FTBFS bug though, which makes "important" a reasonable > severity for this.
It fails to build from source on an architecture it never claimed to support in the first place... > However, we respect your opinion about this being "wishlist" for now and > will likely ship the x86info package in a seperate repository for your > users until the patch is acceptable for inclusion according to your > standards. When I said I hadn't rejected the patch that's exactly what I meant. If I had no intention at all of applying the patch I'd just have closed the report. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
