severity 611456 wishlist kthxbye On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 11:17:44PM +0100, Svante Signell wrote:
> Why downgrading this bug report to a wishlist? Due to lack of support > for multiple cores?? Take a look at the output of x86info for a That's a part of it, yes - you've submitted a partial patch which doesn't implement enough support to work fully on pretty much all modern systems. > GNU/Linux box with dual cores, especially the last lines! This bug is > important due to the support of a new architecture and a patch and from > what I've learned regarding severity levels it is important! Prove me > wrong and I'll concur. Please take a reality check here - the code for this leaf package now compiles but does not fully run on an architecture which isn't exactly likely to be a release candidate in the near future. This doesn't strike me as being the most urgent issue ever. > Which are your arguments for kfreebsd, which is one of the > supported architectures of x86info? Note that I downgraded the severity to wishlist. This is different to closing the bug. All you're doing by trying to keep the severity of the bug inflated is to annoy me. > Under GNU/Linux: ... > WARNING: Detected SMP, but unable to access cpuid driver. > Used Uniprocessor CPU routines. Results inaccurate. As the output says the program was unable to access the cpuid driver. The cpuid driver requires administrative rights. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
